# Vertical Pod Autoscaler

## Contents
- [Contents](#contents)
- [Intro](#intro)
- [Installation](#installation)
  - [Compatibility](#compatibility)
  - [Notice on deprecation of v1beta2 version (>=0.13.0)](#notice-on-deprecation-of-v1beta2-version-0130)
  - [Notice on removal of v1beta1 version (>=0.5.0)](#notice-on-removal-of-v1beta1-version-050)
  - [Prerequisites](#prerequisites)
  - [Install command](#install-command)
  - [Quick start](#quick-start)
  - [Test your installation](#test-your-installation)
  - [Example VPA configuration](#example-vpa-configuration)
  - [Troubleshooting](#troubleshooting)
  - [Components of VPA](#components-of-vpa)
  - [Tear down](#tear-down)
- [Limits control](#limits-control)
- [Examples](#examples)
  - [Keeping limit proportional to request](#keeping-limit-proportional-to-request)
  - [Capping to Limit Range](#capping-to-limit-range)
  - [Resource Policy Overriding Limit Range](#resource-policy-overriding-limit-range)
  - [Starting multiple recommenders](#starting-multiple-recommenders)
  - [Using CPU management with static policy](#using-cpu-management-with-static-policy)
  - [Controlling eviction behavior based on scaling direction and resource](#controlling-eviction-behavior-based-on-scaling-direction-and-resource)
  - [Limiting which namespaces are used](#limiting-which-namespaces-are-used)
  - [Setting the webhook failurePolicy](#setting-the-webhook-failurepolicy)
- [Known limitations](#known-limitations)
- [Related links](#related-links)

# Intro

Vertical Pod Autoscaler (VPA) frees users from the necessity of setting
up-to-date resource limits and requests for the containers in their pods. When
configured, it will set the requests automatically based on usage and thus
allow proper scheduling onto nodes so that appropriate resource amount is
available for each pod. It will also maintain ratios between limits and
requests that were specified in initial containers configuration.

It can both down-scale pods that are over-requesting resources, and also
up-scale pods that are under-requesting resources based on their usage over
time.

Autoscaling is configured with a
[Custom Resource Definition object](https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/api-extension/custom-resources/)
called [VerticalPodAutoscaler](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/blob/master/vertical-pod-autoscaler/pkg/apis/autoscaling.k8s.io/v1/types.go).
It allows to specify which pods should be vertically autoscaled as well as if/how the
resource recommendations are applied.

To enable vertical pod autoscaling on your cluster please follow the installation
procedure described below.

# Installation

The current default version is Vertical Pod Autoscaler 1.2.1

### Compatibility

| VPA version     | Kubernetes version |
|-----------------|--------------------|
| 1.2.1           | 1.27+              |
| 1.2.0           | 1.27+              |
| 1.1.2           | 1.25+              |
| 1.1.1           | 1.25+              |
| 1.0             | 1.25+              |
| 0.14            | 1.25+              |
| 0.13            | 1.25+              |
| 0.12            | 1.25+              |
| 0.11            | 1.22 - 1.24        |
| 0.10            | 1.22+              |
| 0.9             | 1.16+              |
| 0.8             | 1.13+              |
| 0.4 to 0.7      | 1.11+              |
| 0.3.X and lower | 1.7+               |

### Notice on CRD update (>=1.0.0)
**NOTE:** In version 1.0.0, we have updated the CRD definition and added RBAC for the
status resource. If you are upgrading from version (<=0.14.0), you must update the CRD
definition and RBAC.
```shell
kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/vpa-release-1.0/vertical-pod-autoscaler/deploy/vpa-v1-crd-gen.yaml
kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/vpa-release-1.0/vertical-pod-autoscaler/deploy/vpa-rbac.yaml
```
Another method is to re-execute the ./hack/vpa-process-yamls.sh script.
```shell
git clone https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler.git
cd autoscaler/vertical-pod-autoscaler
git checkout origin/vpa-release-1.0
REGISTRY=registry.k8s.io/autoscaling TAG=1.0.0 ./hack/vpa-process-yamls.sh apply
```

If you need to roll back to version (<=0.14.0), please check out the release for your
rollback version and execute ./hack/vpa-process-yamls.sh. For example, to rollback to 0.14.0:
```shell
git checkout origin/vpa-release-0.14
REGISTRY=registry.k8s.io/autoscaling TAG=0.14.0 ./hack/vpa-process-yamls.sh apply
kubectl delete clusterrole system:vpa-status-actor
kubectl delete clusterrolebinding system:vpa-status-actor
```

### Notice on deprecation of v1beta2 version (>=0.13.0)
**NOTE:** In 0.13.0 we deprecate `autoscaling.k8s.io/v1beta2` API. We plan to
remove this API version. While for now you can continue to use `v1beta2` API we
recommend using `autoscaling.k8s.io/v1` instead. `v1` and `v1beta2` APIs are
almost identical (`v1` API has some fields which are not present in `v1beta2`)
so simply changing which API version you're calling should be enough in almost
all cases.

### Notice on removal of v1beta1 version (>=0.5.0)

**NOTE:** In 0.5.0 we disabled the old version of the API - `autoscaling.k8s.io/v1beta1`.
The VPA objects in this version will no longer receive recommendations and
existing recommendations will be removed. The objects will remain present though
and a ConfigUnsupported condition will be set on them.

This doc is for installing latest VPA. For instructions on migration from older versions see [Migration Doc](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/blob/master/vertical-pod-autoscaler/MIGRATE.md).


### Prerequisites

* `kubectl` should be connected to the cluster you want to install VPA.
* The metrics server must be deployed in your cluster. Read more about [Metrics Server](https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/metrics-server).
* If you are using a GKE Kubernetes cluster, you will need to grant your current Google
  identity `cluster-admin` role. Otherwise, you won't be authorized to grant extra
  privileges to the VPA system components.
  ```console
  $ gcloud info | grep Account    # get current google identity
  Account: [myname@example.org]

  $ kubectl create clusterrolebinding myname-cluster-admin-binding --clusterrole=cluster-admin --user=myname@example.org
  Clusterrolebinding "myname-cluster-admin-binding" created
  ```
* If you already have another version of VPA installed in your cluster, you have to tear down
  the existing installation first with:
  ```
  ./hack/vpa-down.sh
  ```

### Install command

To install VPA, please download the source code of VPA (for example with `git clone https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler.git`)
and run the following command inside the `vertical-pod-autoscaler` directory:

```
./hack/vpa-up.sh
```

Note: the script currently reads environment variables: `$REGISTRY` and `$TAG`.
Make sure you leave them unset unless you want to use a non-default version of VPA.


Note: If you are seeing following error during this step:
```
unknown option -addext
```
please upgrade openssl to version 1.1.1 or higher (needs to support -addext option) or use ./hack/vpa-up.sh on the [0.8 release branch](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/tree/vpa-release-0.8).

The script issues multiple `kubectl` commands to the
cluster that insert the configuration and start all needed pods (see
[architecture](https://github.com/kubernetes/design-proposals-archive/blob/main/autoscaling/vertical-pod-autoscaler.md#architecture-overview))
in the `kube-system` namespace. It also generates
and uploads a secret (a CA cert) used by VPA Admission Controller when communicating
with the API server.

To print YAML contents with all resources that would be understood by
`kubectl diff|apply|...` commands, you can use

```
./hack/vpa-process-yamls.sh print
```

The output of that command won't include secret information generated by
[pkg/admission-controller/gencerts.sh](pkg/admission-controller/gencerts.sh) script.

### Quick start

After [installation](#installation) the system is ready to recommend and set
resource requests for your pods.
In order to use it, you need to insert a *Vertical Pod Autoscaler* resource for
each controller that you want to have automatically computed resource requirements.
This will be most commonly a **Deployment**.
There are four modes in which *VPAs* operate:

* `"Auto"`: VPA assigns resource requests on pod creation as well as updates
  them on existing pods using the preferred update mechanism. Currently, this is
  equivalent to `"Recreate"` (see below). Once restart free ("in-place") update
  of pod requests is available, it may be used as the preferred update mechanism by
  the `"Auto"` mode.
* `"Recreate"`: VPA assigns resource requests on pod creation as well as updates
  them on existing pods by evicting them when the requested resources differ significantly
  from the new recommendation (respecting the Pod Disruption Budget, if defined).
  This mode should be used rarely, only if you need to ensure that the pods are restarted
  whenever the resource request changes. Otherwise, prefer the `"Auto"` mode which may take
  advantage of restart-free updates once they are available.
* `"Initial"`: VPA only assigns resource requests on pod creation and never changes them
  later.
* `"Off"`: VPA does not automatically change the resource requirements of the pods.
  The recommendations are calculated and can be inspected in the VPA object.

### Test your installation

A simple way to check if Vertical Pod Autoscaler is fully operational in your
cluster is to create a sample deployment and a corresponding VPA config:
```
kubectl create -f examples/hamster.yaml
```

The above command creates a deployment with two pods, each running a single container
that requests 100 millicores and tries to utilize slightly above 500 millicores.
The command also creates a VPA config pointing at the deployment.
VPA will observe the behaviour of the pods, and after about 5 minutes, they should get
updated with a higher CPU request
(note that VPA does not modify the template in the deployment, but the actual requests
of the pods are updated). To see VPA config and current recommended resource requests run:
```
kubectl describe vpa
```


*Note: if your cluster has little free capacity these pods may be unable to schedule.
You may need to add more nodes or adjust examples/hamster.yaml to use less CPU.*

### Example VPA configuration

```
apiVersion: autoscaling.k8s.io/v1
kind: VerticalPodAutoscaler
metadata:
  name: my-app-vpa
spec:
  targetRef:
    apiVersion: "apps/v1"
    kind:       Deployment
    name:       my-app
  updatePolicy:
    updateMode: "Auto"
```

### Troubleshooting

To diagnose problems with a VPA installation, perform the following steps:

* Check if all system components are running:
```
kubectl --namespace=kube-system get pods|grep vpa
```
The above command should list 3 pods (recommender, updater and admission-controller)
all in state Running.

* Check if the system components log any errors.
  For each of the pods returned by the previous command do:
```
kubectl --namespace=kube-system logs [pod name] | grep -e '^E[0-9]\{4\}'
```

* Check that the VPA Custom Resource Definition was created:
```
kubectl get customresourcedefinition | grep verticalpodautoscalers
```

### Components of VPA

The project consists of 3 components:

* [Recommender](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/blob/master/vertical-pod-autoscaler/pkg/recommender/README.md) - it monitors the current and past resource consumption and, based on it,
  provides recommended values for the containers' cpu and memory requests.

* [Updater](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/blob/master/vertical-pod-autoscaler/pkg/updater/README.md) - it checks which of the managed pods have correct resources set and, if not,
  kills them so that they can be recreated by their controllers with the updated requests.

* [Admission Plugin](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/blob/master/vertical-pod-autoscaler/pkg/admission-controller/README.md) - it sets the correct resource requests on new pods (either just created
  or recreated by their controller due to Updater's activity).

More on the architecture can be found [HERE](https://github.com/kubernetes/design-proposals-archive/blob/main/autoscaling/vertical-pod-autoscaler.md).

### Tear down

Note that if you stop running VPA in your cluster, the resource requests
for the pods already modified by VPA will not change, but any new pods
will get resources as defined in your controllers (i.e. deployment or
replicaset) and not according to previous recommendations made by VPA.

To stop using Vertical Pod Autoscaling in your cluster:
* If running on GKE, clean up role bindings created in [Prerequisites](#prerequisites):
```
kubectl delete clusterrolebinding myname-cluster-admin-binding
```
* Tear down VPA components:
```
./hack/vpa-down.sh
```

# Limits control

When setting limits VPA will conform to
[resource policies](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/blob/master/vertical-pod-autoscaler/pkg/apis/autoscaling.k8s.io/v1/types.go#L100).
It will maintain limit to request ratio specified for all containers.

VPA will try to cap recommendations between min and max of
[limit ranges](https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/policy/limit-range/). If limit range conflicts
with VPA resource policy, VPA will follow VPA policy (and set values outside the limit
range).

To disable getting VPA recommendations for an individual container, set `mode` to `"Off"` in `containerPolicies`.

## Examples

### Keeping limit proportional to request

The container template specifies resource request for 500 milli CPU and 1 GB of RAM. The template also
specifies resource limit of 2 GB RAM. VPA recommendation is 1000 milli CPU and 2 GB of RAM. When VPA
applies the recommendation, it will also set the memory limit to 4 GB.

### Capping to Limit Range

The container template specifies resource request for 500 milli CPU and 1 GB of RAM. The template also
specifies resource limit of 2 GB RAM. A limit range sets a maximum limit to 3 GB RAM per container.
VPA recommendation is 1000 milli CPU and 2 GB of RAM. When VPA applies the recommendation, it will
set the memory limit to 3 GB (to keep it within the allowed limit range) and the memory request to 1.5 GB (
to maintain a 2:1 limit/request ratio from the template).

### Resource Policy Overriding Limit Range

The container template specifies resource request for 500 milli CPU and 1 GB of RAM. The template also
specifies a resource limit of 2 GB RAM. A limit range sets a maximum limit to 3 GB RAM per container.
VPAs Container Resource Policy requires VPA to set containers request to at least 750 milli CPU and
2 GB RAM. VPA recommendation is 1000 milli CPU and 2 GB of RAM. When applying the recommendation,
VPA will set RAM request to 2 GB (following the resource policy) and RAM limit to 4 GB (to maintain
the 2:1 limit/request ratio from the template).

### Starting multiple recommenders

It is possible to start one or more extra recommenders in order to use different percentile on different workload profiles.
For example you could have 3 profiles: [frugal](deploy/recommender-deployment-low.yaml),
[standard](deploy/recommender-deployment.yaml) and
[performance](deploy/recommender-deployment-high.yaml) which will
use different TargetCPUPercentile (50, 90 and 95) to calculate their recommendations.

Please note the usage of the following arguments to override default names and percentiles:
- --recommender-name=performance
- --target-cpu-percentile=0.95

You can then choose which recommender to use by setting `recommenders` inside the `VerticalPodAutoscaler` spec.


### Custom memory bump-up after OOMKill
After an OOMKill event was observed, VPA increases the memory recommendation based on the observed memory usage in the event according to this formula: `recommendation = memory-usage-in-oomkill-event + max(oom-min-bump-up-bytes, memory-usage-in-oomkill-event * oom-bump-up-ratio)`.
You can configure the minimum bump-up as well as the multiplier by specifying startup arguments for the recommender:
`oom-bump-up-ratio` specifies the memory bump up ratio when OOM occurred, default is `1.2`. This means, memory will be increased by 20% after an OOMKill event.
`oom-min-bump-up-bytes` specifies minimal increase of memory after observing OOM. Defaults to `100 * 1024 * 1024` (=100MiB)

Usage in recommender deployment
```
  containers:
  - name: recommender
    args:
      - --oom-bump-up-ratio=2.0
      - --oom-min-bump-up-bytes=524288000
```

### Using CPU management with static policy

If you are using the [CPU management with static policy](https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/cpu-management-policies/#static-policy) for some containers,
you probably want the CPU recommendation to be an integer. A dedicated recommendation pre-processor can perform a round up on the CPU recommendation. Recommendation capping still applies after the round up.
To activate this feature, pass the flag `--cpu-integer-post-processor-enabled` when you start the recommender.
The pre-processor only acts on containers having a specific configuration. This configuration consists in an annotation on your VPA object for each impacted container.
The annotation format is the following:
```
vpa-post-processor.kubernetes.io/{containerName}_integerCPU=true
```

### Controlling eviction behavior based on scaling direction and resource
 To limit disruptions caused by evictions, you can put additional constraints on the Updater's eviction behavior by specifying `.updatePolicy.EvictionRequirements` in the VPA spec. An `EvictionRequirement` contains a resource and a `ChangeRequirement`, which is evaluated by comparing a new recommendation against the currently set resources for a container.
 Here is an example configuration which allows evictions only when CPU or memory get scaled up, but not when they both are scaled down
 ```
 updatePolicy:
   evictionRequirements:
     - resources: ["cpu", "memory"]
       changeRequirement: TargetHigherThanRequests
 ```
 Note that this doesn't prevent scaling down entirely, as Pods may get recreated for different reasons, resulting in a new recommendation being applied. See [the original AEP](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/tree/master/vertical-pod-autoscaler/enhancements/4831-control-eviction-behavior) for more context and usage information.

 ### Limiting which namespaces are used

 By default the VPA will run against all namespaces. You can limit that behaviour by setting the following options:

1. `ignored-vpa-object-namespaces` - A comma separated list of namespaces to ignore
1. `vpa-object-namespace` - A single namespace to monitor

These options cannot be used together and are mutually exclusive. 

 ### Setting the webhook failurePolicy

 It is possible to set the failurePolicy of the webhook to `Fail` by passing `--webhook-failure-policy-fail=true` to the VPA admission controller.
 Please use this option with caution as it may be possible to break Pod creation if there is a failure with the VPA.
Using it in conjunction with `--ignored-vpa-object-namespaces=kube-system` or `--vpa-object-namespace` to reduce risk.

# Known limitations

* Whenever VPA updates the pod resources, the pod is recreated, which causes all
  running containers to be recreated. The pod may be recreated on a different
  node.
* VPA cannot guarantee that pods it evicts or deletes to apply recommendations
  (when configured in `Auto` and `Recreate` modes) will be successfully
  recreated. This can be partly
  addressed by using VPA together with [Cluster Autoscaler](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/blob/master/cluster-autoscaler/FAQ.md#basics).
* VPA does not update resources of pods which are not run under a controller.
* Vertical Pod Autoscaler **should not be used with the [Horizontal Pod
  Autoscaler](https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/run-application/horizontal-pod-autoscale/#support-for-resource-metrics)
  (HPA) on the same resource metric (CPU or memory)** at this moment. However, you can use [VPA with
  HPA on separate resource metrics](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/issues/6247) (e.g. VPA
  on memory and HPA on CPU) as well as with [HPA on custom and external
  metrics](https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/run-application/horizontal-pod-autoscale/#scaling-on-custom-metrics).
* The VPA admission controller is an admission webhook. If you add other admission webhooks
  to your cluster, it is important to analyze how they interact and whether they may conflict
  with each other. The order of admission controllers is defined by a flag on API server.
* VPA reacts to most out-of-memory events, but not in all situations.
* VPA performance has not been tested in large clusters.
* VPA recommendation might exceed available resources (e.g. Node size, available
  size, available quota) and cause **pods to go pending**. This can be partly
  addressed by using VPA together with [Cluster Autoscaler](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/blob/master/cluster-autoscaler/FAQ.md#basics).
* Multiple VPA resources matching the same pod have undefined behavior.
* Running the vpa-recommender with leader election enabled (`--leader-elect=true`) in a GKE cluster
  causes contention with a lease called `vpa-recommender` held by the GKE system component of the
  same name. To run your own VPA in GKE, make sure to specify a different lease name using
  `--leader-elect-resource-name=vpa-recommender-lease` (or specify your own lease name).

# Related links

* [FAQ](FAQ.md)
* [Design
  proposal](https://github.com/kubernetes/design-proposals-archive/blob/main/autoscaling/vertical-pod-autoscaler.md)
* [API
  definition](pkg/apis/autoscaling.k8s.io/v1/types.go)
